The standard IAS 41 Agriculture prescribes measuring all biological assets at fair value less costs to sell (with exceptions), while all the changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss.

Here, one significant question arises: How should you account for expenditures that you incur during the year in relation to these biological assets?

Food, vaccinations, veterinary expenses, fertilizers, pesticides…?

In this article with video, I tried to answer the question from Wai from Australia who struggled with exactly the same thing:

“I work for a company that owns a few sheep farms. We are breeding sheep for sale and for the purpose of the production of sheep products like milk, cheese and other.

I know that we must apply IAS 41 for accounting of sheep and remeasure them at fair value less costs to sell at the end of the reporting period.

But, how shall we account for expenses like food for animals and veterinary costs?”
 

Answer: IAS 41 does not tell you, so make your own policy

I am sure that many accountants working in agricultural activities will appreciate the answer to this question and not only if you work in the animal production, but the similar questions pop out in the companies working with plants, like palm trees, wheat, vineyards and other.

In fact, my answer will not only relate to the animal food and veterinary expenses, but also to fertilizers, pesticides, removing the weed and other related expenses.

So how shall we account for these costs?

Well, the trouble is that the standard IAS 41 Agriculture is silent on this topic.

There are no exact rules on how to present these costs.

Why?

I read the basis for conclusion related to IAS 41 – that’s a document explaining why the standard creators created the rules as they are.

It says that it is not necessary to make the rules about the subsequent expenditures in agricultural activities, because biological assets need to be remeasured to their fair value less cost to sell with all changes in profit or loss and thus it does not matter how you treat the subsequent expenditure.

I do not fully agree with this approach, for a very simple reason:

It is true that the effect on profit or loss will always be the same – I will show you in the short illustration later.

But, the presentation of the individual expenses in your profit or loss is totally affected by the way of how you treat the subsequent expenditure.

Also, your cash flow statement will look differently.
 

Select the accounting policy

In any case, it is YOU who need to set the accounting policy of treating the subsequent expenditure.

Basically, you have 2 options:

  1. Put all subsequent expenditure in profit or loss directly, or
  2. Capitalize the subsequent expenditure in the carrying amount of your biological assets.

Expenses IAS 41
 
Let’s explain.
 

Option #1: All expenses in profit or loss

This is very simple and very easy way of doing the things.

In my opinion, it is not ideal, because in this case, you would show big expenses in your profit or loss statement and on the other hand, you would show big increase in fair value of your biological assets.

What’s wrong with that?

Special For You! Have you already checked out the  IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!

Well, the fair value of your biological assets increases not only due to external market changes, but also due to your activities like feeding the animals, taking care of them etc.

If you present all expenses in profit or loss, you are effectively presenting the increase in fair value in one bunch regardless its source or reason.

Sure, fo some assets, you need to add additional disclosures about the fair value change due to price change and physical change – but this disclosure is just encouraged, not obligatory.
 

Option #2: Capitalize expenses in the carrying amount of an asset.

Under the first option, you would add the expenses to the carrying amount of the biological asset.

This way, you do not show big expenses for agricultural activity in your profit or loss, and also you show smaller increase in fair value of your biological assets.

In my opinion, this method reflects the fair value changes better than the first method, but it is more demanding and challenging.

Example: expense vs. capitalize

Let’s say the fair value of your herd of sheep was CU 1 000 at the end of year 1.

In the year 2, you spent CU 200 for the sheep food supplements, vet and other living and breeding expenses.

The fair value of your herd is CU 1 500 at the end of the year 2.

Accounting #1 – all expenses in profit or loss:
The journal entry for the subsequent expenses is:

  • Debit Profit or loss – operating expenses: CU 200
  • Credit Suppliers / Bank account: CU 200

The journal entry to remeasure the carrying amount of sheep herd to fair value less cost to sell at the end of year 2:

  • Debit Biological assets: CU 500 (CU 1 500 – CU 1 000)
  • Credit Fair value change in profit or loss: CU 500

Here, the net effect in profit or loss is CU 300 which a gain from remeasurement of 500 less the expenses of 200.

Accounting #2 – expenses are capitalized:

The journal entry for the subsequent expenses is:

  • Debit Biological assets – sheep herd: CU 200
  • Credit Suppliers / Bank account: CU 200

The journal entry to remeasure the carrying amount of sheep herd to fair value less cost to sell at the end of year 2:

  • Debit Biological assets: CU 300 (CU 1 500 – CU 1 200)
  • Credit Fair value change in profit or loss: CU 300

The net effect in profit or loss is CU 300 which is just gain from remeasurement.

So it’s the same, but the presentation is different.

This table summarizes the impact on profit or loss:

Expense Capitalize
FV change 500 300
Operating expenses -200 0
Net effect on P/L 300 300

 

How to set your accounting policy?

Finally let me just outline the optimal process of setting the accounting policy for the subsequent expenditures.

If you want to take it easy regardless the presentation in profit or loss, then go for option 1 and put all the expenses in profit or loss as they arise.

If you care more about the presentation of your profit or loss and cash flows, then you can try looking at IAS 2 and IAS 16 for some guidance.

These standards do not apply to biological assets, but you can use them as help in developing your own policy.

You can just decide that all the expenses that maintain the assets, are expensed – for example, routine vaccinations of animals, pesticides with plants, etc.

And, all the expenses that help increase the yield or outcome of the biological assets would be capitalized – for example, food supplements or fertilizers.

This is quite challenging, because here you need to apply your judgement to determined which costs to capitalize and which to expense.

Here’s the video summing up the issue:

Any questions or comments?

Please add them below this article. Thank you!