# How to capitalize exchange differences on loan as borrowing costs?

“We are a real estate constructor and we took a loan to finance our new construction. In Russia the interest rates are quite high and therefore we negotiated the loan in EUR from one international bank.

I know that at the year-end we have to translate the EUR loan to Russian rubles with the closing rate and as a result a foreign exchange loss arose. Can we capitalize it as a borrowing cost? How can we calculate how much exchange difference on the loan we can capitalize?”

### Answer: Look to IAS 23

So, the borrowing costs in general are arranged by the standard IAS 23 Borrowing Costs.

This standard defines what the borrowing cost is and lists a few items as examples.

One of these items is exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs.

Therefore, by definition, ** YOU CANNOT capitalize the full exchange difference** that arose on translation or revaluation of your EUR loans to rubles at the end of the reporting period because

**.**

*not all of it is a borrowing cost*What part ends up in profit or loss?

And, what exchange differences actually are borrowing costs under IAS 23?

### How to determine what part of your total exchange difference to capitalize?

Unfortunately, IAS 23 is silent on how to do it or what method you should use.

It means that you have to use your judgment.

The gains and losses regarded as adjustment to interest cost are mainly the difference between:

- The borrowing costs that would be incurred if you borrowed in your own functional currency (RUB in this case); and
- The borrowing costs actually incurred on foreign currency borrowings (EUR in this case, translated to RUB with appropriate rates).

I’ve read that IFRIC (Interpretation committee for IFRS) considered 2 methods:

- You can estimate the portion of exchange loss or gain to capitalize based on
, or*forward currency rates at the inception of the loan* - You can estimate it based on
in your own functional currency – for me, this method is maybe easier.*interest rates on similar borrowings*

Practically, you can just ** limit the exchange differences **to capitalize so that the total borrowing costs capitalized do not exceed the amount of hypothetical borrowing costs on similar loan in your functional currency.

### Illustration: Exchange differences to capitalize

Let’s say you took a loan of 100 000 EUR to finance the building of your new offices in June 20X1 when the rate was 67,54 RUB (rubles) for 1 EUR.

**Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!**

*Special For You!*The reason why you took the loan in EUR was that the interest rate on EUR loan was 2% and the interest rate on RUB loans was 4%.

Then, you keep recognizing the loan at amortized cost and it’s carrying amount at the end of 20X1 is 83 700 EUR which is 5 700 000 RUB.

You recognized the interest cost on that loan in 20X1 amounting to 1 000 EUR (that’s roughly interest for 6 months at 2% annual agreed rate) which makes 68 300 RUB in your accounts.

Let’s say that the interest accrues monthly and you always used month-end rate to book the interest expense.

Please don’t start analyzing where I got these numbers from – I just made them up based on effective interest method table, but rounded them a bit.

So, let’s say that the closing rate at 31 December 20X1 is 69,39 RUB per 1 EUR and thus your foreign currency loan translates to RUB as 83 700 EUR times the rate of 69,39 = 5 808 000 RUB.

You have a foreign currency loss of 108 000 RUB (5 808 000-5 700 000). And, let’s say this is a full foreign currency loss on retranslating the loan to RUB during 20X1.

How to deal with this loan?

First, let’s compare the interest costs:

was 1 000 EUR or 68 300 RUB (please see above)*The actual interest cost on EUR loan*would be 133 755 RUB. The calculation is:*The hypothetical interest cost on the same loan in RUB*- Amount of loan in RUB: 100 000 EUR x historical rate of 67,54 RUB/EUR = 6 754 000 RUB
- Interest for 6 months at 4% annual rate: 6 754 000*(1,04^(6/12)-1) = 133 755 RUB (the calculation in brackets is deriving semi-annual rate from 4% annual rate, because you can’t simply divide it by 2)

is 133 755 – 68 300 = 65 455 RUB*The difference*

Therefore, the journal entry to deal with the full foreign currency loss is:

- Debit PPE – new offices: 65 455 RUB
- Debit Profit or loss – FX loss: 42 545 RUB (which is 108 000 of total loss less 65 455)
- Credit Loan: 108 000 RUB

Total capitalized interest on the loan is the actual interest of CU 68 300 plus the capitalized exchange difference related to adjustment of interest of CU 65 455 and that makes 133 755 CU.

Any questions? Please leave a comment below – thank you!

##### Tags In

JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET

report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course

Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

## 12 Comments

### Leave a Reply Cancel reply

### Recent Comments

### Categories

- Accounting Policies and Estimates (14)
- Consolidation and Groups (24)
- Current Assets (21)
- Financial Instruments (55)
- Financial Statements (48)
- Foreign Currency (9)
- IFRS Videos (66)
- Insurance (3)
- Most popular (6)
- Non-current Assets (54)
- Other Topics (15)
- Provisions and Other Liabilities (44)
- Revenue Recognition (26)

Hi, what if the project are long term project (4-6) years, and based on monthly forex rate fluctuation there will be loss or gain forex, how is the accounting treatment for forex gain on the project

Good morning

Please i need clarification on the exchange difference arising on my loan carrying balances arising from exchange rate movement in the year.

The illustration uses FX rates at random

1. 67.54 (The hypothetical interest cost on the same loan in RUB – Amount of loan in RUB: 100 000 EUR x historical rate of 67,54 RUB/EUR = 6 754 000 RUB)

2. Somewhere 68.10 somewhere (Then, you keep recognizing the loan at amortized cost and it’s carrying amount at the end of 20X1 is 83 700 EUR which is 5 700 000 RUB)

3. Somewhere 68.30 (You recognized the interest cost on that loan in 20X1 amounting to 1 000 EUR (that’s roughly interest for 6 months at 2% annual agreed rate) which makes 68 300 RUB in your accounts

Dear Sanat,

this illustration illustrates the method of calculating, not selection of FX rates. I told you up there that I made them up. One reason is that the interest accrues daily or monthly, everytime with different rate. This is why the closing rate before revaluation was different from the initial rate and from the rate at which the interest was recognized. Sorry, I thought this was clear enough.

Thanks for the message. My confusion arises as the IAS 21 talks about specific FX rate to be taken for converting to presentation currency so it shall be closing rate. So if I convert 83,700 using closing rate of 69.39 would that be correct.

Yes, closing rate and yes, that’s correct and that’s also what I wrote in the example.

Then, you keep recognizing the loan at amortized cost and it’s carrying amount at the end of 20X1 is 83 700 EUR which is 5 700 000 RUB. – How has she arrived at 83,700 and how 5,700,000 is arrived (at what exchange rate)

Hello,

How do we account for foreign exchange difference on shares issued (initial payment from investor)

Debit PPE – new offices: 65 455 RUB

Debit Profit or loss – FX loss: 42 545 RUB (which is 108 000 of total loss less 65 455)

Credit Loan: 108 000 RUB

What if the full foreign currency loss on retranslating the loan to RUB during 20X1 is less than 65 455 RUB, say 50,000 RUB? In that case do we [1] Debit PPE 50,000 RUB only or [2] Debit PPE – new offices: 65 455 RUB and Credit Profit or loss – FX loss: 15 545 RUB?

Silvia, hi,

Just a little note, if I am correct, there should be 133 755 CU instead of 85 855 CU in the last paragrath.

Hi Vitally,

Sure of course, it is just a technical mistake. Otherwise, Sylvia couldn’t have made such a additional mistake))

Oh, thank you Vitaly and Mushvig, you are right, my fast fingers!!! 🙂