Is a hotel an investment property under IAS 40?
“I am an accountant of the hotel chain in India. Our hotels provide short-term accommodation to our guests, but we also have apartments for long-term rentals to residents.
Short-term guests have the room, breakfast, cleaning and free entrance to the hotel pool in the price of the rental.
Long-term guests have only the room and pool, no cleaning and no food.
We also use a few rooms as hotel offices.
How can we classify the hotel with all three purposes: long-term stay, short-term stay and our offices? I think it is an investment property because we get the revenue from rental income, but what about the food, cleaning and own offices?”
IFRS Answer 025
Here, the hotel is used for two purposes:
- Administrative purposes – you are using a part of it for your own offices. Thus it indicates the hotel is property, plant and equipment under IAS 16.
- Rental purposes – you rent out the rooms to short-term guests and long-term guests. Thus it indicates the hotel is investment property under IAS 40. We will get back to this point a bit later.
”Split accounting” for property
The standard IAS 40 says that if you use a property for both “investment property uses” like rentals and “non-investment property uses” like own office use, and if you can sell or lease out the parts of the property, then you should account for these parts separately.
Let’s say you have a building with 2 000 square meters and you use 500 square meters as your own offices and rent out 1 500 square meters to tenants to earn rental income, then you should account for ¼ of the building under IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment and for ¾ of the building under IAS 40 Investment property.
It maybe seems complicated, but it does not need to be.
The reason is that under IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment you have 2 options:
- Either you apply the cost model ; or
- You apply the revaluation model.
Under IAS 40 Investment property, you also have 2 options:
- You can apply either fair value model or;
- Cost model as under IAS 16.
So, whatever you use your hotel for, you can simply apply cost model to both and you have no accounting complication here.
OK OK, I know.
Your management or owners want to apply fair value model to investment property, because the property prices in your area increase and they can show nicer profits from fair value increases.
This is true.
So in this case, you would have to split the area of the hotel.
However, let me come back to short-term rentals and long-term rentals.
Assess the ancillary services
The trouble is that you, the owner of the hotel, supply so-called ancillary services to your clients.
What are these services?
Food, daily cleaning, change of towels, etc. provided to your short-term guests.
When someone books a room for 1-2 nights, all these services are included in the price.
The standard IAS 40 says that if you provide ancillary services to the tenants, then you classify the property based on the extent of these services:
- If they are insignificant to the contract as a whole, then the property is an investment property under IAS 40.
For example, maintenance or security services are seen as insignificant.
- If you provide significant ancillary services, then the property is not an investment property under IAS 40, but the property, plant and equipment under IAS 16.
For example, food and daily cleaning services are significant to the arrangement as a whole.
Thus, how to classify the hotel from today’s question?
- A part used for own offices is a part used for admin purposes and that’s the property, plant and equipment (IAS 16);
- A part used for long-term rentals with insignificant ancillary services like security is still used for rentals to others and thus it’s an investment property under IAS 40,
- A part used for short-term overnight stays with signifincat ancillary services like food and daily cleaning cannot be classified as investment property under IAS 40, so it is a property, plant and equipment under IAS 16.
Any questions? Please leave me a comment below, thank you!
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
- Silvia on 3 Biggest Myths in Accounting for PPE
- Silvia on IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment – summary
- Silvia on Hedge Accounting: IAS 39 vs. IFRS 9
- Ana Fuenmayor on Hedge Accounting: IAS 39 vs. IFRS 9
- Md. Omar on IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment – summary
- Accounting Policies and Estimates (12)
- Consolidation and Groups (24)
- Current Assets (21)
- Financial Instruments (54)
- Financial Statements (45)
- Foreign Currency (9)
- IFRS Videos (63)
- Insurance (1)
- Most popular (6)
- Non-current Assets (54)
- Other Topics (15)
- Provisions and Other Liabilities (43)
- Revenue Recognition (25)
I am working in UAE and our owner constructed a building for the hotel business with all the furniture and fixture and other equipment and rented out the same with furniture and fixture, so my question is whether only the building portion should be classified as an Investment property and the furniture and fixture and other equipment should as PPE or both be classified as PPE.
a question, if the main activity in which my company operates is rental and leasing activities, and we have only property which we hold to rent, am I applying IAS 40 to the property, or IAS 16? Thanks and happy new year
Hi Silvia, may I know how should I treat an investment property that has a sluggish demand? How could it affect the treatment?
Dear Respected slivia,
Hope you are fine and doing well.
I have a question regarding recognition of revaluation gain/loss of investment properties. acutally it look like that the related gain/loss is unrealized, but as per IAS 40 it goes to Income statement. Is there any reason for? your kind instruction is highly appreciated.
I look forward to hear from you soon.
yes, you are right – the change in fair value of investment property is recognized in profit or loss. The reason is that this approach provides the most relevant and transparent view of the financial performance of investment property – this is at least what the authors of IAS 40 quote. For more reasons, please revise basis for conclusion of IAS 40 – this is the official document issued by IASB reasoning why they designed the rules as they are. S.
Hello Mam! Hope You are doing good. My name is Suraj and I am from Nepal.
My question is related to a building fully owned by the company. Where Company uses two floors for its administrative purpose and remaining 3 floors as held for rentals. Yes, I understood that floors used for administrative purpose should treated under IAS 16 and floors held as rental should be treated under IAS 40. However I am stuck on Para 10 of IAS 40 where it is written as “If these portions could be sold separately (or leased out separately under a finance lease), an entity accounts for the portions separately. If the portions could not be sold separately, the property is investment property only if an insignificant portion is held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes. In my case, though floors used for administrative purpose is still a significant portion of a while building, chances of selling rented portion separately is very remote in our case. So can we treat whole building under IAS 16?
If the portions could not be sold or *lease out* separately,